Twitter, TMI, and the ease-of-use drivel conundrum
admin
Great post about Twitter yesterday by Dave Kellogg, CEO of Eastwick client Mark Logic. I completely agree with Dave that most of what appears on Twitter is drivel. One of my favorite songwriters, Tom Lehrer, once said, “Life is a like a sewer. What you get out of it depends upon what you put into it.” I would say the same holds true for social media tools like Twitter.
Which brings me to my second point. As we develop and make widely available technologies for the recording and dissemination of the written word, there is an associated degradation in the quality of the words that are written. In the Middle Ages, illuminated religious manuscripts were created by trained professionals, who carefully copied the Bible, the Torah, the Koran, etc. from approved sources. Later, the Chinese and then Guttenberg, invented movable type, and cheaper papers replaced vellum, making books easier and less expensive to produce and therefore available to a wider audience. I won’t outline the entire continuum, but suffice it to say it includes the introduction and popularization of things like books, newspapers and dime novels, the telegraph, radio, television, the Telex, the Internet, bulletin boards, chat, instant messaging, the Web, blogging, wikis and now, Twitter.
With the introduction of each of these developments came reduced barriers to participation. Costs became lower, and with lower costs came less (or no) oversight, because the usual motivation for controlling “content,” except perhaps in the political sphere and arguably there as well, is financial risk. Online communications tools, once the domain of the geek and the technical elite, became more highly integrated with popular operating systems and browsers, and became less complicated to learn and use. So give people easy-to-use communications tools with no one holding a financial interest in the quality and nature of the content, and you get what we have today: a web of millions of web sites and millions of blogs with trillions of words, most of which are, statistically at least, of no use or relevance to anyone.
If you walk through the Tenderloin area of San Francisco, you will frequently pass people talking out loud to no one in particular muttering things like, “that’s a shiny red car,” and “I just ate an apple.” Many of us cross to the other side of the street when we encounter these people. With Twitter, what would be disturbing to us in “real life,” has somehow taken on the aura of “spontaneous, transparent content” online. Back in the day, we used to call this TMI, Too Much Info. Twitter is, then, a little too transparent for my tastes.
Posted in Elitism, Social Media |
No Comments »



